Republic
Bank vs. Court of Appeals
GR
No. 42725 April 22, 1991
Grino
– Aquino, J.:
Facts:
San Miguel Corporation drew a
dividend check worth P240 on its account in First National City Bank in favor
of J. Roberto Delgado, a stock holder. The amount on its face was fraudulently
and without authority of the drawer, altered by increasing it from P240 to P9,
240. The check was indorsed and deposited by Delgado to his account with
Republic bank. Republic endorsed the check to FNCB and presented I for payment
through the Central Bank Clearing House.
FNCB paid P9, 240 to the Republic through the Central Bank Clearing
House. SMC notified FNCB of trhe material alteration in the check in question.
FNCB informed Republic with regard to the alteration nand forgery of the
endorsement of Delgado. By the, Delgado had already withdrawn his account from
the republic. FNCB demanded that Republic refund the P9, 240. Trial court rendered judgment in favor of
FNCB and it was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
Issue:
Whether Republic, as the collecting
bank, is protected, by 24-hour clearing house rule, found in CB circular No. 9,
as amended, from liability to refund the amount paid by FNCB, as drawee of the
SMC dividend check.
Held:
No. The 24-hour clearing house rule
is valid rule applicable to commercial banks. It is true that when an
indorsement is forged, the collecting bank or last endorser, as general rule,
bears the loss. But the unqualified endorsement of the collecting bank on the
check should be read together with the 24-hour regulation on the clearing house
operation. Thus, when the drawee bank fails to return a forged or altered check
to the collecting bank is absolved from liability. Unless an alteration is
attributable to the fault or negligence of the drawer himself, such as when he
leaves spaces on the check which would allow the fraudulent insertion of
additional numerals in the amount appearing thereon, the remedy of the drawee
bank that negligently clears a forged and/or honor altered check for payment is
against the party responsible for the forgery or alteration, otherwise, it
bears the loss. It may not charge the amount so paid to the account of the
drawer, if the latter was free from blame, nor recover it from the collecting
bank is the latter made payment after proper clearance from the drawee.
No comments:
Post a Comment